Unions unable to charge lobbying costs to dues protesters, rules NLRB
In another setback to unions, the NLRB held that unions cannot charge lobbying costs to dues protesters.
In the NLRB’s terminology, a dues protestor is called a “Beck objector,” after the Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Communication Workers v. Beck. There, the Supreme Court held that workers in a unionized workplace have the right to refuse to pay full union dues; instead, a so-called Beck objector can insist on paying only the share of dues that funds negotiating, administering and fighting grievances under his/her own collective bargaining agreement. Unions, therefore, set a fee rate that is lower than full dues, and must provide Beck objectors the calculations that show they are charging only Beck fees.
In this case, the Board held, first, that unions must provide those calculations to Beck objectors in the form a verified audit letter from the union’s auditor.
Next the Board turned to the union’s lobbying expenses. In this case, the union spent money to lobby state legislatures in support of legislative activity that it felt behooved its bargaining unit members, not just at this contract, but for all its members. The Board held that none of the lobbying efforts could be charged to Beck objectors.
Consistent with these cases, we conclude that lobbying expenses are not chargeable to Beck objectors under the NLRA. We accordingly find that the Union violated its duty of fair representation by charging nonmember objectors for expenses incurred as to any of the lobbying activities at issue.
The case deals a heavy blow to unions, which frequently undertake significant lobbying efforts on behalf of their bargaining unit members.
Source: United Nurses and Allied Professionals, 367 NLRB No. 94 (3/1/19).
